Growl Voice in Ethnic and Pop Styles
Ken-Ichi Sakakibara, Leonardo Fuks, Hiroshi Imagawa, Niro Tayama 2004
Among the so-called extended vocal techniques, vocal growl is a rather common effect in some ethnic (e.g. the
This paper examines growl mechanism using videofluoroscopy and high-speed imaging, and its acoustical characteristics by spectral analysis and model simulation. In growl, the larynx position is usually high and aryepiglottic folds vibrate. The aryepiglottic constriction is associated to a unique shape of the vocal tract, including the larynx tube, and characterizes growl.
The term growl is originally referred to as low-pitched sounds uttered by animals, such as dogs, or similar sounds by humans, and therefore is mainly described by auditory-perceptual impression. Growl is widely observed in singing as well as in shouting and aroused speech.
The growl phonation has been also referred to as the
phonation observed in some singing styles, such as the jazz singing style of
Louis Armstrong (1Satchmo’s voice quality revealed roughness in the vocal fold
level, however, he often used growl) and Cab Calloway, [2, 3]. Many jazz,
blues, and gospel singers often use growl in a similar manner. Besides such pop
music from North America, growl styles are widely found in pop music of other
In ethnic music, one of the most prominent uses of
growl is found in umngqokolo, which is a vocal tradition of the Xhosa people in
Growl may have perceptual similarities with the rough or harsh voice. In terms of phonetics, growl is sometimes described as the voiced aryepiglottic trill . However, there is no clear evidence of its production mechanism, such as physiological observation of the aryepglottic vibration.
In throat singing (Tyvan khöömei and Mongolian khöömij), ventricular and vocal fold vibration was observed for the two different laryngeal voices (drone and kargyraa) [4, 9]. In drone, the basic voice in throat singing with a whistle-like high overtone, the ventricular fold vibration is at the same frequency as the vocal fold vibration. I kargyraa, which usually sounds one octave (or more) lower than the modal register, the ventricular folds vibrate at F0/2 when the vocal folds vibrate at F0. Moreover, some singers can do triple-periodic kargyraa in which the ventricular folds vibrate at F0/3. In this paper, the phonation mode with ventricular and vocal fold vibration is called VVM (vocal-ventricular mode) . In growl, there is no clear evidence of the ventricular fold vibration.
The growl, drone, kargyraa, as well as vocal fry, and some pathological voices may have similar perceptual characteristics related to roughness, creakiness, or harshness. Their acoustics may also have similar features. Therefore, clarifying differences among these phonations requires careful physiological observation.
In this paper, we examine the production mechanism of the growl phonation. Some of the authors (KIS, LF), who can utter several phonation modes, including the VVM, produced the growl phonation by carefully listening to and imitating various samples, as mentioned above. Observation of the laryngeal adjustment using endoscopic high-speed imaging and X-ray videofluoroscpy (partly reported in ), confirm the aryepiglottic vibration in growl. We also discuss the acoustical characteristics and differences between VVM (in particular, kargyraa) and growl.
2. Three-tiered sphincter of the larynx
In the human larynx, there is a three-tiered sphincter comprising the vocal folds, the ventricular folds (false vocal folds), and the aryepiglottic sphincter  (Fig. 1).
The ventricular folds are incapable of becoming tense, since they contain very few muscle fibres. However, the ventricular folds can be constricted by the action of certain intrinsic laryngeal muscles. In the aryepiglottic region, the constriction is caused by the approximation of the tubercle of the epiglottis (anterior), aryepiglottic folds (lateral), and arytenoids (posterior). In normal phonation, the vibration of the ventricular and aryepiglottic folds is not observed.
3. X-ray observation
We observed the vertical laryngeal configuration of three different types of phonations (modal, “metallic”, and growl) using X-ray cinematography.
Fig. 2 shows a lateral X-ray view of the phonatory apparatus at rest. A wide pharyngeal space between the epiglottis and the arytenoids is observed. The cricoid cartilage is located at about the level of the fifth cervical vertebrae.
Fig. 3 shows the lateral X-ray views of three different voices: modal (left), “metallic” (centre), and growl (right), in /y/ (close front rounded vowel). The metallic voice has a perceptually metallic impression and, in terms of usual phonetic usage, can be interpreted as pharyngealized, a little pressed (not necessarily tense), and raised-larynx. White lines are traced along the edges of the cricoid, arytenoid, epiglottis, and cervical column. In modal phonation, a wide pharyngeal space is observed.
The epiglottis doesn’t depress and its position is almost similar to that when it is at rest. In metallic and growl, the larynx is raised to about the level of the fourth cervical vertebrae. The epiglottis and arytenoid approximate very closely. There is no significant difference of the laryngeal adjustments between metallic and growl.
4. High-speed images
We observed laryngeal movements in growl directly and indirectly by simultaneous recording of high-speed digital images, EGG (Electroglottography) waveforms, and sound waveforms. The high-speed digital images were captured at 4500 frames/s through an endoscope inserted into the mouth cavity of a singer. Sound and EGG waveforms were sampled at 12 b/s and 18 kHz sf.
In growl phonation, the aryepglottic region is compressed antero-posteriorly, and the tubercle of the epiglottis and the arytenoid cartilages come into contact (Fig. 4).This antero-posterior compression is in good agreement with the lateral view of growl phonation in Fig. 3. Two sided chinks generated by the contact of the epiglottic tubercle and arytenoids were observed. Each chink is surrounded by the epiglottis, arytenoid, and an aryepiglottic fold. In some cases, both aryepiglottic folds vibrate in almost same phase (Fig. 5), and in other cases, the phases of both seem to be slightly different. Furthermore, in some cases, the vibration of the aryepiglottic folds is unstable and seems to be aperiodic.
Fig. 5 shows the sound waveform (top), EGG waveform (middle, ordinate corresponds to total contact area of the larynx), and high-speed images. Vertical lines in the sound and EGG are synchronous to the last frames in each column of the high-speed images. The vibrations of the aryepglottic folds are observed in the high-speed images.
In this case, the aryepiglottic fold vibration is likely to be periodic and the vibration of each side is mostly synchronous.
From the EGG and sound waveform, it is reasonable to conclude that the vocal folds vibrate half-periodically to the aryepiglottic fold vibration. This vibration pattern of the vocal and aryepiglottic folds is same as the VVM with F0/2, i.e. kargyraa. The period-double vibration of the aryepiglottic folds generates subharmonics.
Neither the vocal nor ventricular folds were directly observed because the aryepiglottic folds were strongly constricted. Therefore, it is difficult to prove whether the vocal and ventricular fold vibrate or not. However, we conclude that the vocal and aryepiglottic folds vibrate and ventricular folds do not. The basis of this conclusion is as follows.
Smooth transition from modal to growl is frequently achieved by various singers and the subjects, therefore, it is reasonable to claim that, in growl, the vocal folds vibrate at almost opposite phases. To take account of the delay of the sound to the EGG, we consider that the maximal excitation of sound and the shape of the EGG waveform were mainly due to the vocal fold vibration. Next, if all three folds had simultaneously vibrated, the phases of their vibration would most likely have been different from each other by aerodynamically constraint. However, it is difficult to ascertain this phenomenon from EGG waveform alone. To verify our claim, it is necessary to directly observe the movements of the three folds.
5. Acoustical analysis
Fig. 6 shows a spectrogram of the growl voice. Subharmonics appeared in growl. Similar subharmonic oscillation has been observed in kargyraa [4, 6, 9], and in some cases of vocal fry . Perceptual clarification of differences among these phonations is important. Here, however, we focus on acoustical differences between growl and kargyraa.
Fig. 7 shows the power spectra and spectral envelopes of growl and kargyraa. In growl, the range from above 2kHz has very weak power. Fig. 8 shows the inverse filtered source and its power spectrum of growl and kargyraa.
In growl, a pole is observed at about 1.5 kHz, whereas, in kargyraa, below 4 kHz, the power moderately decreases.
Physiologically, generation of subharmonics is concluded to be caused by the vocal fold vibration in vocal fry, ventricular fold vibration in kargyraa, and the
aryepiglottic vibration in growl. In karygraa, the ventricular fold constriction contributes to the generation of the laryngeal ventricle resonance, which appears as a zero in the laryngeal source. In growl, the aryepiglottic constriction constructs a deeper and larger cavity consisting of the laryngeal ventricle, ventricular fold region, and laryngeal vestibule (Figs. 1, 3, 4). Therefore, the resonance frequency of the cavity must be lower than that of the laryngeal ventricle. Fig. 9 shows the spectra of the synthesized laryngeal source obtained using the two-by-two mass model . For simplicity, the aryepiglottic and ventricular fold vibration and vocal tract are omitted. The pole in the source of growl is at about 1.5 kHz and is lower than in kargyraa.
We also roughly calculated the resonance frequencies of the laryngeal ventricle for kargyraa and the laryngeal cavity for growl by using a Helmholtz resonator. In kargyraa, we assume that the body cylinder (the laryngeal ventricle) has 0.4cm height and 1.5cm squared area and the neck cylinder (the ventricular fold region) 0.8cm height and several areas. In growl, we assume the body has 2.0 cm height and a 1.02cm squared cross-sectional area, and the neck (the aryepiglottic area) 0.4 cm height and several areas (Table 1). If the constricted regions have equal area, the resonance frequency of the source in growl is always lower than that in kargyraa.
6. Discussions and conclusions
In growl, the larynx position is higher than in the modal case, and the aryepiglottic region is strongly approximated.
The aryepiglottic folds vibrate, as well as vocal folds, and contribute to the subharmonic oscillation. The resonance frequency of the cavity induced by the aryepiglottic constriction is lower than that of the laryngeal ventricle, and this characterizes the growl voice.
The mechanism of the supraglottal constriction is still controversial. The supraglottal constriction is widely considered to be caused by an activity of the aryepiglottic muscle, however, from our physiological observations and previous histological observation of the supraglottal muscles , the constrictions of the aryepiglottic and ventricular folds are presumably caused by different mechanisms.
The power of the subharmonics in growl is seemingly lower than in kargyraa, but further analysis is needed to clarify this. Perceptual evaluation of differences among various subharmonic phonations, such as growl, kargyraa, and vocal fry, will be addressed as future work. Analysis of other perceptually similar singing styles, such as Sardinian singing, will also be addressed as future work.
We thank Samuel Araujo, Parham Mokhtari, Seiji Niimi, Makoto Ogawa, Satoshi Takeuchi, and Mamiko Wada for their helpful discussions.
 S. Ara´ujo and L. Fuks. Pr´acticas vocais no samba carioca: un di´alogo entre a ac´ustica musical e a etnomusicologia, In N. M. Claudia and T. M. Refnanda and T. Elizabeth Ed., Ao encontro da Palavra Cantada: poesia, m´usica e voz, pp.278–288, Viveiros de Castro Ltda., 2001.
J. C. Catford. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics,
 J. H. Esling. Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter, J. International Phonetics Association, 26(2):65–88, 1996.
 L. Fuks, B. Hammarberg, and J. Sundberg. A self-sustained vocalventricular phonation mode: acoustical, aerodynamic and glottographic evidences, KTH TMH-QPSR,3/1998:49–59, 1998.
 M. Kimura, K.-I. Sakakibara, H. Imagawa, R. Chan, S. Niimi, and N. Tayama. Histological investigation of the supra-glottal structures in human for understanding abnormal phonation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 112:2446, 2002.
 P.-A° . Lindestad, M. Sodersten, B. Merker, and S. Granqvist. Voice Source Characteristics in Mongolian “Throat Singing” Studied with High-Speed Imaging Technique, Acoustic Spectra, and Inverse Filtering, J. Voice, 15(1):78–85, 2001.
 J. J. Pressman. Sphincters of the larynx, A. M. A. Arch. Otolaryngol., 59(2):221–236, 1954.
K.-I. Sakakibara, H. Imagawa, S. Niimi, and
 K.-I. Sakakibara, T. Konishi, K. Kondo, E. Z. Murano, M. Kumada, H. Imagawa, and S. Niimi. Vocal fold and false vocal fold vibrations and synthesis of kh¨o¨omei, Proc. of ICMC 2001, 135–138, 2001.
R. L. Whitehead, D.
 H. Zemp, Ed. Les Voix du Monde — Une anthologie des expressions vocales. 3 vol. CDs with book, CMX374 1010.12, CNRS/Mus´ee de l’Homme, 1996.